Thursday, 17 November 2016

Barak Obama Delivers a Speech at the Niarchos Cultural Centre in Athens, Greece

His last speech on foreign soil as President of the US.
Labelled "remarks" by the White House PR team, the speech was mostly about democracy (after all, a Greek word - and an Athenian invention) and equality.

So I listened to it.

Unsurprisingly, it was very well delivered - President Obama is a master of public speaking; expressive, simple, always with a touch of humour and accessible, friendly.

As to the content, it was in a word, simple as well. It was an excellent speech to motivate youth; I would have liked my son to be there, not only for the thrill of listening to the President of the US speak to you but also because what he says is easy to grasp and that makes youth feel they have communicated, albeit remotely, with an important personality of human history.

In all its simplicity, the speech did have some somewhat daring highlights. For one, Barak Obama did say that politicians know there are things to do - but they lack the political courage to implement them; he also mentioned that investment flow into countries that make things easier for investors - manifestly not the case of Greece at present, for example. On another plain, he did suggest that democracies do not move forward in a linear manner, but sometimes move backward in order to move forward again. And he did not forget to mention that, in a democracy all people are created equal regardless of their differences (which differences, especially economy-related, are exacerbated by the effects of global access to information). The latter may be a diplomatic reference to his successor, who extolled different ideals during his campaign.

Interestingly, he called the European Union one of the "most important political achievements of the 20th century". The audience clapped (the euro-confused Greek government remained silent, fortunately.)

President Obama also pointed out (in more diplomatic terms) that democracy is a global, historical and powerful brand name, older than Christianity itself, invented and first implemented in (ancient) Athens. So Athens is the cradle of democracy, a fact that, presumably, many Greeks and most Greek politicians are happy to forget.

Other than the personal interest of the President, one wonders what the purpose of this visit was. It certainly offered Greece another 15 mins of fame, positive fame this time round. From another standpoint, that of the citizen, his presence and his speeches did make people proud. So in all, Greece reaped psychological benefit. Which, in a sense, is non negligible.




President Obama at the Acropolis of Athens, 16th November 2016 (photo from the White House)


And for all its simplicity, his remarks had a positive effect on many people, not only those present at the Niarchos Foundation. For that too, people in Greece are grateful.
In a nutshell, it would seem that the US President made Greeks a present: the last visit of the first non white President of the United States of America, was in Greece. And that is now a part of history.

Let's hope he enjoyed the visit as well!

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

Advice to Take On A Spelling Journey

Today I should probably be babbling about the latest US elections, congratulating my American friends on their new president or commiserating with them for having the lesser votes take the spoils (Ms Clinton had slightly more votes in her favour than Mr Trump). But I do not vote in the US so there is not for me to say anything other than, "best of luck!" and, "you never know!"

As a side remark inspired by these US elections, most European countries excepting the strict north are blessed with idiotic politicians anyway; we seem to be suffering in the REIGN of the MORON in many European countries, especially in the south.

As a diversion, I thought I would delve in spelling instead.

And begin with the ubiquitous apostrophe: ' Especially as it confers with s, along with other considerations.

There is a widespread misuse of this apostrophe with the consequent incomprehensible results in the text being offered -- so much so, that it could be intentional, or a fad. But there is no indication of a fashion trend for misusing the apostrophe, so it must be illiteracy. Either that or a glitch in the spell-checker, which comes back to illiteracy -- of the programmer.

Here is a variety of apostrophes:

IT + S:
It's = it is OR it has. Nothing else. As in, "it's a very nice day today", "it's been a long time", 
Its = possessive that which belongs to it: "it's been the longest game in its history", "the sun shone, ITS rays reflecting off the silver...". NO apostrophe when it mes to the word "it".



Use an apostrophe to show possession:

We use an apostrophe to show possession: when the possessor is singular, the ' goes before the s. When plural, after the plural "s". The exception is (1) when the plural word itself does NOT end in an s: i.e., children, people,OR (2) a non-plural word ending in an "s".
John's car= the car that belongs to John.
Julia's bedroom= i.e. the bedroom attributed to Julia.
The car's upholstery= the upholstery of that car.
The voters' response= the response of many voters 
The voter's response= the response of one voter
(1)"The men's chambers"= chambers for many men
(2) "Charles' latest purchase is a bicycle..."



Apostrophe with plurals:
The plural is usually formed by adding an "s" at the end. There is NO apostrophe. No exceptions! To use an apostrophe is a superlative blunder.
One car. Many cars. One girl. Two girls. "Pearls melt in vinegar". "The results of this election are dire". NO apostrophe for plural.




Contractions:
We use an apostrophe to replace letters in contractions, mostly the words, not, is, have, us, are, will...


aren'tare not
can'tcannot
couldn'tcould not
didn'tdid not
doesn'tdoes not
don'tdo not
hadn'thad not
hasn'thas not
haven'thave not
he'dhe had, he would
he'llhe will, he shall
he'she is, he has
I'dI had, I would
I'llI will, I shall
I'mI am
I'veI have
isn'tis not
it'sit is, it has
let'slet us
mustn'tmust not
shan'tshall not
she'dshe had, she would
she'llshe will, she shall
she'sshe is, she has
shouldn'tshould not
that'sthat is, that has
there'sthere is, there has
they'dthey had, they would
they'llthey will, they shall
they'rethey are
they'vethey have
we'dwe had, we would
we'rewe are
we'vewe have
weren'twere not
what'llwhat will, what shall
what'rewhat are
what'swhat is, what has
what'vewhat have
where'swhere is, where has
who'dwho had, who would
who'llwho will, who shall
who'rewho are
who'swho is, who has
who'vewho have
won'twill not
wouldn'twould not
you'dyou had, you would
you'llyou will, you shall
you'reyou are
you'veyou have
 IS: "The weather's moody today"= "the weather IS moody today"LET'S= let us 
Reminder" you / we + have, are:
        -You've= you have, "you've been a good student..."
        -YOU'RE= you are, NOT "your":"you're diligent and your marks have gone up..."
        -WE'RE= we are "we're sure of our course..."
        -WE'VE= we have "we've gone far enough in these fields; Let's turn back..."

    


Time related (temporal):
All in a day's work"= the work of one day

"Three days' notice"= it is more than one day
"A month's salary"= one month
"Six months' bonus"= many months


I hope this can be of some little use to some people, somewhat interested in ridding their texts of common mistakes...