Tuesday, 25 May 2010

Views and reports from afar: Canada

The following appeared in Maclean's, one of Canada's widest reaching and prestigious papers.

It is written by Mark Steyn, an eloquent writer and defender of the English language spoken & written correctly...

Sundry comments in brackets are mine.

''Not just their Big Fat Greek Funeral

MARK STEYN: As lazy, feckless, corrupt and violent as Greece undoubtedly is, it’s not that untypical.

Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:00am


From the Times of London: “The President of Greece warned last night that his country stood on the brink of the abyss after three people were killed when an anti-government mob set fire to the Athens bank where they worked.”

Almost right. They were not an “anti-government” mob, but a government mob, a mob comprised largely of civil servants. That they are highly uncivil and disinclined to serve should come as no surprise: they’re paid more and they retire earlier, and that’s how they want to keep it. So they’re objecting to austerity measures that would end, for example, the tradition of 14 monthly paycheques per annum. [Not quite: the cheques are simply annual income divided by 14] You read that right: the Greek public sector cannot be bound by anything so humdrum as temporal reality. So, when it was mooted that the “workers” might henceforth receive a mere 12 monthly paycheques per annum, they rioted. Their hapless victims—a man and two women—were a trio of clerks trapped in a bank when the mob set it alight and then obstructed emergency crews attempting to rescue them.

Unlovely as they are, the Greek rioters are the logical end point of the advanced social democratic state: not an oppressed underclass, but a pampered overclass, rioting in defence of its privileges and insisting on more subsidy, more benefits, more featherbedding, more government. [Not quite: it's not"the advanced social democratic state" that's the problem. Early retirement, etc, is chicken feed compared to big state contracts for construction, medical and pharmaceutical supplies, and especially defence equipment contracts. It's an elite that has enjoyed these kickbacks privileges primarily, and the '' advanced social democracy'' is an eye blinder used on the rest of the population. Hence the use and role of Unions in Greece. To keep a lid on things.
The elite is, of course, civil servants' and other Union leaders, politicians and their entourage of 10.000, and a few business tycoons.]

Who will pay for it? Hey, not my problem, say the rioters. Maybe those dead bank clerks’ clients, assuming we didn’t burn them to death, too. The problem facing the Western world isn’t very difficult to figure out: we’ve spent tomorrow today, and we can never earn enough tomorrow to pay for what we’ve already burned through. When you’re spending four trillion dollars but only raising two trillion in revenue (the Obama model), you’ve no intention of paying it off, and the rest of the world knows it. In Greece, the arithmetic is starker. To prop up unsustainable welfare states, most of the Western world isn’t “printing money” but instead printing credit cards and pre-approving our unborn grandchildren. That would be a dodgy proposition at the best of times. But in the Mediterranean those grandchildren are never going to be born. As I pointed out in my bestselling hate crime America Alone four years ago, Greece has one of the lowest fertility rates on the planet—1.3 children per couple, which places it in the “lowest-low” demographic category from which no society has recovered and, according to the UN, 178th out of 195 countries. In practical terms, it means 100 grandparents have 42 grandkids. Greek public sector employees are entitled not only to 14 monthly paycheques per annum during their “working” lives, but also 14 monthly retirement cheques per annum till death. Who’s going to be around to pay for that?

Welcome to My Big Fat Greek Funeral. As to every profligate Western politician’s enduring faith in mass immigration, what hardworking foreigner in his right mind would move to the Hellenes? According to the World Bank, when it comes to the ease of doing business, Greece ranks 109th out of 183 countries. If they were dramatically to liberate their business-killing economy, they might overtake Lebanon at big hit position 108, and Ethiopia at 107, and maybe Papua New Guinea at 102. And who knows? With even more radical reform, they might crack the Hot One Hundred and be bubbling under such favourable business environments as Yemen (99) and Moldova (94). Greece ranks 140th when it comes to starting a business, and 154th when it comes to protecting investors. They cannot mitigate their deathbed demography through immigration, because, even more so than Canada and the rest of Europe, the only foreigners with any incentive to head there are those who either want to lounge around on welfare or plot jihad at taxpayer expense. In my “alarmist” book I put it this way:“Projected public pensions liabilities are expected to rise by 2040 to about 6.8 per cent of GDP in the U.S. In Greece, the figure is 25 per cent—i.e., total societal collapse.” (My emphasis)

[Add to the above, the most obvious drawback: labour legislation in Greece, practically forbids temporary employment, part-time employment, occasional employment, home employment, contractual employment, and complicates overtime. It also institutes humongous fines immediately payable -- say, 30.000 euro on a point of bureaucracy regarding one employee's holiday.... But a passenger ship that does not execute its scheduled trip may be fined 1.750 Euro! Porn is in the low VAT category, but baby milk is in the middle category]

Four years on, thanks to Obama in Washington and business as usual in Athens, the situation has worsened. Yet in a sense the comparison is academic: whereas America still has a choice, Greece isn’t going to have a 2040. The mob is rioting for the right to continue suspending reality until they’re all dead. After that, who cares?

Greece has run out of Greeks to stick it to. So it’s turned to Germany. But Germany too is in net population decline. The Chinese and other buyers of Western debt know that. If you’re an investor and you don’t, more fool you. Tracking GDP versus median age in the world’s major economies is the easiest way to figure out where this story’s heading.

Traditionally, a bank is a means by which old people with capital lend to young people with ideas. But the advanced democracies with their mountains of sovereign debt are in effect old people who’ve blown through their capital and are all out of ideas looking for young people flush enough to bail them out. And the idea that it might be time for the spendthrift geezers to change their ways butts up against their indestructible moral vanity. Last year, President Sarkozy said that the G20 summit provided “a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to give capitalism a conscience.” European capitalism may have a conscience. It’s not clear it has a pulse. And, actually, when you’re burning Greek bank clerks to death in defence of your benefits, your “conscience” isn’t much in evidence, either.

Let us take it as read that Greece is an outlier. As waggish officials in Brussels and Strasbourg will tell you, it only snuck into the EU due to some sort of clerical error. It’s a cesspit of sloth and corruption even by Mediterranean standards. On my last brief visit, Athens was a visibly decrepit dump: a town with a handful of splendid ancient ruins surrounded by a multitude of hideous graffiti-covered contemporary ruins. If you were going to cut one “advanced” social democracy loose and watch it plunge into the abyss pour encourager les autres, it would be hard to devise a better candidate than Greece.

And yet and yet . . . riot-wracked Athens isn’t that much of an outlier. Greece’s 2010 budget deficit is 12.2 per cent of GDP; Ireland’s is 14.7. Greece’s debt is 125 per cent of GDP; Italy’s is 117 per cent. Greece’s 65-plus population will increase from 18 per cent in 2005 to 25 per cent in 2030; Spain’s will increase from 17 per cent to 25 per cent. As lazy, feckless, squalid, corrupt and violent as Greece undoubtedly is, it’s not that untypical. It’s where the rest of Europe’s headed, and Japan and North America shortly thereafter. About half the global economy is living beyond not only its means but its diminished number of children’s means.

Instead of addressing that basic fact, countries with government debt of 125 per cent of GDP are being “rescued” by countries with government debt of 80 per cent of GDP. Good luck with that. Alas, the world has deemed Greece “too big to fail,” even though in (what’s the word?) reality it’s too big not to fail. And the rest of us are too big not to follow in its path:

“Another reform high on the list is removing the state from the marketplace in crucial sectors like health care, transportation and energy and allowing private investment,” reported the New York Times. “Economists say that the liberalization of trucking routes—where a trucking licence can cost up to $90,000—and the health care industry would help bring down prices in these areas, which are among the highest in Europe.”

Removing the state from health care brings down prices? Who knew? This New York Times is presumably entirely unrelated to the New York Times that’s spent the last year arguing for the governmentalization of U.S. health care as a means of controlling costs.

The EU is now throwing an extra trillion dollars at countries which by any objective measure are insolvent, and are unlikely ever again to be anything but—at least this side of bloody revolution. How do you grow your economy in a remorselessly shrinking market? That’s to say, Greece is a land of ever fewer customers and fewer workers but ever more retirees and more government. How do you increase GDP? By export? Where? You’re entirely uncompetitive; you can’t make anything at a price any foreigner would be prepared to pay for it. More to the point, foreigners already own your debt, and just servicing that in the years ahead will gobble up around 10 per cent of GDP—which you’ll have to try and make up domestically. How? You’ve got some of the lowest productivity rates in Europe, and a “workforce” that would rather rouse itself to murder bank tellers. [Not quite; one of the reasons Greece is un- everything, is that employment is so expenbsive. In open parlance, a quick way to reform the country would be, a) to eliminate Unions and discredit them (i.e. expose them for what they are, self-centred vote peddling Komsomols) in the eyes of the people and b) eliminate all labour law and regulations except for the basic definitions of employment, social security, and income tax. For starters.]

Greece, wrote Theodore Dalrymple, is “a cradle not only of democracy but of democratic corruption”—of electorates who give their votes to leaders who bribe them with baubles purchased by borrowing against a future that can never pay it off. The future is now here, and the riots will spread. ''


Thus wrote eloquent Mr M. Steyn.



'''One reader commented the following:
John Gordon says:
In the Paris Reparations Agreement of 1946 the German war crimes against Greece were billed at 7.1 billion US dollars. A few years later, under the threat of the oncoming Cold War, Germany was already needed by the Allies in the struggle against communism. For this reason, it was agreed in the London Agreement of 1953 that the recognised reparation demands against Germany should be postponed – until a final settlement in a later peace treaty.____Germany also during occupation (1941-1944) was given a mandatory loan from Greece (yes from Greece to Germany) to the size of 3,5 billions USD.____A total sum of 10,6 billions USD at 1938 prices, not today. Even at a modest interest of 4%, this money accounts to 130 billions USD, half of the total debt of Greece!__This war reparations does not take into account the cultural objects stolen of Greece stolen during occupation, neither the massacres of civilians – over 300,000 Greeks died during the occupation and ensuing civil war.__Before the minister of economy of Germany says that Germans are not liable of the faults of Greeks, he should pay back the faults of his ancestors, money that was lawfully is to be given to Greece, and then half of Greek debt will be paid. '''


OK, this was along post.

Friday, 7 May 2010

The "Troika" saves Greece & its government. How 'bout the Greeks?

A chant, commonly heard on the island of Mykonos, Greece.

"Olli Rehn,
don't touch my Cayenne"

O. Rehn is the European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs. The cayenne is a type of pepper and also a model by a car manufacturer named Porsche. It is of course, the latter which is referred to in the chant.

Greeks, even the ones driving Cayennes (price new: Euro 80-110k) are under the misapprehension, and the media and their government are quick to confirm, that it is Commissioner Rehn, the bad IMF, President Barroso, and other hidden forces out there dictating austerity to the poor Socialist government of Greece which, in turn, cannot but conform. Because Greece needs the bail-out money!

I.e., there is no doubt that Commissioner Rehn dictated increase of VAT by 5 points and the inclusion of food in the high VAT rate! Perhaps he even contributed a recipe or two!

It is evident that Mr Thomsen from the IMF indicated that specific civil servants' pay must be cut across the board, he probably even chose these by name...

By the same token, it must be the same bad guys who suggested that wages be cut in the private sector too (why?) but the valiant Greek government resisted...

Or, even further, it must be they (referred to as "Troika") who imposed a law where all employment be restrictively put under labour union supervision and control, contingency labour be restricted, and temporary employment impracticable...

While, by the end of this year, redundancy will be simplified. So on one hand you lose your jobs, on the other hand legislation makes sure there are no other jobs to be had!


Is it stubbornness, or are Greeks incapable of waking up, what on earth are these people doing?


The country is bust, and the average pension in Greece was 765 euro/month before the cuts. Some people worked hard all their lives and contributed; they are going to lose part of their pension. Many fought in WW-2. Not all Greeks are lazy; indeed few are. These people will suffer.


* Despite everything, and when all is said and done, the civil service has remained the same in size and people and efficiency; new committees are being set up to supervise recruitment in the public sector...

* Access to jobs in the public sector has become more bureaucratic...

* Access to the dole has been boosted!

* Access to jobs
in the private sector has become much more restricted... (as of this week!)

* A number of jobs has been eliminated by law.

* The money-market seems ready to dry up.


Does the Greek Premier cat know what his ministerial mice (especially the labour ones) are doing? As Mr Papandreou comes across as a decent person, the answer to the question seems to be: most unlikely!


Maybe Greece would have been much better off if, indeed, Commissioner Rehn, President JE Barroso, the IMF Greece team were as involved as they are made out to be...

Ultimately, Greeks deserve better.

Monday, 3 May 2010

While my guitar gently weaps...


Speeches were made for political expediency (unashamedly!) by the Prime Minister of Greece and crocodile tears were shed following the announcement of the first batch of austerity measures on Sunday 2nd May.
"Sniff, it's their fault (the ubiquitous "others" again) not ours";
"Sniff, patriots, simple people are ready to up their whole salary to help (good, because I won't -- what, you crazy?)".
"In these times we will pull through together (you put up the money and I'll do the clapping). "

Amen,
Amen,
Amen.


Instead this man should have said:
  • The ones called upon today to foot the bill are mostly those who benefited little, benefited indirectly, or not at all from the spending spree we politicians started at the country's expense decades ago;
  • For years, we the politicians have been hoodwinking you with simple communication techniques; we have successfully appealed to your emotional side;
  • We have been deceiving you -- but of course politicians are hardly expected to tell the truth, are they?
  • Those who have benefited greatly are not much affected by this crisis; they have enough stashed away to survive and retain their lifestyle -- albeit with some changes. Changes are exciting.
  • Do you all know that ever since my father's reign, we have lived well beyond our means, we have turned many EU subsidies to personal profit, we have bought votes;
  • We have lost part of these subsidies because we never actually applied for them! Why? Because while the interested parties were fighting over the split deadlines were lost -- so the loot is gone!
  • Some of you rallied to this racket patiently hoping for your turn to share the loot! You are the ones who accepted the racket as a means to make a quick buck;
  • Rather than rely on work to create wealth, net worth in Greece was gained the back door of state subsidy or state contracts -- which we, the politicians, controlled; Either that or you inherited real estate! So why work? It did not lead anywhere.
  • Basically, we spent money but created little or no wealth! No added value.
"Does anyone understand what I am saying? I am just a sociologist trying to find a way out of this *&%^#@ mess; I'm surrounded by people who can't even spell their *&%$#@ name; And all these people want is to win the next elections and make some money on the way! &*(^%$# ! And I don't even know the first thing about finance!!!"
A longish comment in the Economist ("Comments on Europe's sovereign debt crisis: Acropolis") deserves the extra attention it commands.

"The question that will go unanswered in the whole crisis, is what would have been different had the German government rescued Greece in a more timely fashion.

I think not all that much. The austerity measures placed on Greece are unreasonable, unjustifiable and have no way of achieving their goal of repaying the debt. Austerity measures are tantamount to collectively putting Greece into a debtor's prison. (...)

Putting a debtor into prison only works, if the debtor in fact *has* the money, but refuses to pay it. But more often than not, the debtor has spent the money in one way or another and no matter how long you let him rot in prison, will not be able to pay it back. If your desire is to get your money back and not to shame the debtor, then you'd rather help him find a way to earn it back.

Placing austerity measures on a country with the hope of its debt being repaid, assumes that its expenditure is somehow so grossly in excess of its needs, that reducing expenditure alone will easily be enough to pay it back. But this is not at all the case. Even if Greece decided to cut *all* its military expenditure in order to repay its debt, the Greek deficit would merely be diminished from its current 13% of GDP to 9%.

Extravagant expenditure alone cannot account for the deficit and cutting expenditure will do nothing to effectively diminish it, not to mention do anything in the way of repaying Greek debt. [Presumably the writer refers to standard expenditure, not extraordinary cash outflows of all kinds. If so, he is wrong. There are holes that can be easily identified and plugged. To name but one, OSE, the state run railway, loses Euro: 1 billion per year.]

Trying to repay Greece's debt through austerity measures - increased taxes and decreased spending - is a laughable proposition. There are exactly two ways in which Greece can repay its debt.

1) Inflation. This will be impossible unless Greece gets out of the Euro area and also undesirable for all involved.

2) Economic growth. But this will require increased spending, reduced taxes and growing wages - quite the contrary of the austerity measures required from both the IMF and the EU (with Germany in the front line) and almost impossible to achieve so long as Germany follows the doctrine of keeping its real-wage growth below increases of productivity in order to dump its products on other markets - which is impoverishing its own people and those abroad.

The other options to resolve the issue are debt forgiveness, debt restructuring or default. All of which amount to the same.

It is one thing to demand more efficient state spending and investments to spur economic growth and give advise how to achieve that. (Which I would agree with.) It is quite another to just demand indiscriminate cuts in government spending and increases in taxation to sooth the population of Germany and the other EU countries. Instead of holding a useless grudge against Greece, a real solution addressing the economic imbalances within the EU would be best for all concerned."