Friday, 12 February 2016

Communication Crises: Vying for Attention, Who cares About the Victims

Yesterday morning I was communication and digital communication with a Public Relations executive.

She specialises in managing crises - from a communications point of view.

She detailed the tactics one follows, before, during and following the crisis inducing event; how one identifies and then focuses on stakeholders and stakeholders' communication channels. And she gave me examples of what happens in such cases. How the stakeholders often pich up cudgels and staves in favour of the victims (real or purported).
The victims are usually the employees of the corporation.

Let's take the example of a corporate "reorganisation" -- i.e. firing of employees en masse.


As I listened to her describe the stakeholders involvement, during & post event ,  realised a number of things.
Two stand out: they illustrated the utter folly of self-centred selfishness of all actions involved

1) Consumer organisaitons rallying in favour of Boycotting the corporation (to teach them a lesson): obvious boomerang effect, especially for the smaller subsidiaries  of multinationals. Hitting the company where "it hurts the most" safely results in the loss of more jobs as the corporate numbers no longer add up.
So, more lay -offs.

 But, does anyone care - other than the employees and their friends and families? Which brings me to the second realisation.

2) No stakeholder actually cares about the stakeholders; unions, consumer organisations, local municipalities, etc, outdo one another in their  efforts to captivate attention and push forward their own agenda - basically their own awareness and PR campaign.


Stakeholders couldn't care less about the victims. If ever anything good comes out of any of the usually vociferous mobilisations pursuant to a crisis inducing action, it is fortuitous.


Had the stakeholders been really interested, the would have campaigned long and hard to attract global attention - even for a legendary 15min! Hit corporate equity where it hurts most: the corporate image. Research and come up with real dta; present said data. Go global, try to go viral with it. And put the vistims first.

Ain;t gonna happen.
Victims are alone... except for happy coincidences. Maybe.


Let us, at least, drink to the health of these victims. More than their job, in many countries they also lose their medical care.

Thursday, 14 January 2016

David Robert Jones and Thoughts on Genius

David Bowie (David Robert Jones) dies 5 days ago on Jan 10th.

Ziggy Stardust lives on.

The Rocket Man embarked upon his last journey from earth.


Thinking of Bowie while watching Clapton play in a video, I wondered what makes such people what they are.

The word I ended with is genius: these people have genius.

What is this genius?

I reflected on this for a while, trying to understand genius (not easy as I am not one) and trying to make a long issue brief.

Ultimately, I think that genius is a combination of many things; these things come together in a person and that person stands out: globally, universally.


More to the point, that person brings together all these elements and that is what makes that person stand out, globally, universally.

Others may have elements and do not bring them together - or not to a similar degree.

Here are some of the elements I thought of:

  • They have the music inside them
  • They have or acquire sufficient technical expertise to express this music to the world
  • They have perception of how we want to hear music
  • They are not afraid to immerse themselves into world and do their thing
  • They are not afraid of reflecting, identifying, and creating or implementing their thing
  • The times are receptive
  • These people are perceptive and intuitive: perceptive to respond to their times and intuitive, allowing heart & mind to work together
  • They have the competence to attract the right people around them and the foresight to distance themselves from the wrong people
  • Create the right events 
  • Be fearless in doing things
  • Be THEMSELVES at all times
  • Recognise themselves and their calling
  • Follow their intuition and their calling 
  • Overcome their fears - sublimate their shortcomings, let their qualities flow
  •   
  •   
  •   
 ...and much more I'm sure.
Not easy to fit a genius inside a brief post!



Monday, 9 November 2015

A Greek Politician at a Public Event, hosted at Parliament in London.

A speech was given by Thanos Tzimeros, a Greek politician and leader of Dimourghia Xana, at a public event that took place in Parliament on the 4th November 2015.

 It addresses issues surrounding Greece, its present state and thoughts about a possible more positive future.

T. Tzimeros is a good talker and often manages to be humorous, caustic, and truthful in even doses in his addresses. In so doing he does not distort reality; and the few numbers included in his speeches are usually correct AFAIK.

It is not a bad text and it does give a reasonably accurate overview of why things are what they are in Greece and how they came to be as they are. And it is refreshingly short for a politician...

No further comments necessary.

------------
"Right Honourable Members of the British Parliament, dear all!
I thank you for the invitation and for granting me the opportunity to analyze the causes that have driven my country, a country which in the past inspired poets and philosophers, to inspire today only cartoonists and presenters of satirical shows.
Greece is a country in deep crisis, a crisis that is not only financial. I would dare to say that the financial issue is the least of its problems. For the past 35 years, Greece has been living through a continuous decline in ethics, institutions, public life, education and the level of its leaders.
There is no precedent in World History where a government adopted as its official state policy the blackmailing of its partners. This is precisely what SYRIZA did during its seven-month "negotiation" with the European Union - negotiation in quotation marks. And, let us not forget that the EU partners had already given to a basically bankrupt state, an enormous debt “haircut” and two bailout loan agreements with extremely favourable terms, mostly at the expense of the European taxpayers.
It is clear that the SYRIZA government went to Brussels with the following shocking message, a message which was its central platform during the pre-election campaign period: "You lend us money, we spend it. And, we intend to keep on spending in the exact same way that led us into bankruptcy; on huge pensions for fifty-year olds and on salaries for hundreds of thousands of redundant civil servants, many of whom with a ghost job description. And, not only shall we not fire any persons holding sinecure offices, but we shall hire even more civil servants and create more early pensioners. We are not undertaking any commitments for the new loans that we want you to give to us, and we demand that you write off the old ones." Unbelievable!
According to the SYRIZA propaganda in Greece, there was not even one in a million probability that the European Union would turn down the demands of SYRIZA, because the alternative of not lending to this Neo-Bolshevik Greek government would be the collapse of the European Union, a much greater catastrophe that the leaders of the European Union would certainly want to avoid!
I am ashamed for my country’s government. I am ashamed for its politicians. I am ashamed of the image of Greece in the modern world. I admire the composure and patience of the European governments that continued to negotiate for 7 months with these blackmailers! However, surprisingly, the SYRIZA won the national elections for a second time in a row. What has happened? Have the Greeks gone mad?
No. Even for the most irrational of behaviors there is always a rational explanation. But one has to look at the entire picture. Please, allow me a brief historical overview. It is essential in order to comprehend the Greek Drama.
The rule of law was never really applied in Greece, a country that did not go through the renaissance and the enlightenment. The Ottoman occupation was succeeded by an Ottoman model of governance, “Greek style”. The Greek State has always been a mixture of guilds and interest groups, in conflict with each other. The core of this model has always been state sponsored patronage. In Greece we call it “clientelism”. The Greek citizens have been giving their vote to those from whom they expected the greatest benefit.
The Greek politicians, on the other hand, ensured their re-election by giving away public money through the appointments to civil service positions, and through the granting of pensions and allowances. Policies to benefit the entire Greek population have never taken hold in Greece. The political parties seized power by any and all means, lawful or not, in order to look after their client sextion of the people and, of course, to put their hands on the public money wich is taxpayers’ money, as the late baroness Thatcher used to say.
Consequently, in the past, the Greeks were divided because of conflicts of interest and not because of substantial ideological differences. The ideological differences came after the civil war. Under the pretext of the communist danger, the rightist governments, who won the civil war, adopted practices of legalized fascism, which divided the Greeks between “loyalists” and “infected”. Infected were not only the communists, but also the progressive thinking citizens. No person could occupy public office, get higher education, or even marry a civil servant, unless they could obtain a “certificate of political convictions”, granted by the police, which certified that none of the person's family members had ever been involved in any “anti-national activity”.
Given the fact that this term is totally vague, it was at the discretion of the police officer to determine how to classify a person and thus stigmatize him or her for the rest of his or her life. This regime lasted until 1981, leaving the civil war wounds open, and leading the post-war generations to believe that anything to the "right" is fascist and regressive, while anything to the "left" is synonymous with progress and humanism.
Then, came PASOK with Andreas Papandreou. By opening up the public sector to the leftists, who up to that time had been excluded, he could have led Greece to a national reconciliation. In addition, he happened to come into power at the time when the then E.E.C had opened the tap of financing. Thus, Andreas Papandreou also had the financial means to build the necessary infrastructure and modernise the country, especially its institutional framework.
He did exactly the opposite. He fostered a new division, but this time it was the rightists that were left out of the game, and all power went to Papandreou's partisans. In the first year of his tenure, he increased the number of civil servants from 121,000 to 208,000! By the time the crisis broke out, Greece had nearly 1,100,000 civil servants, burdening the State with a cost of 31 billion Euros per year!
Andreas Papandreou created one more industry of debt production and of "buying of consciences": pensions. He was granting early retirement at full pension to literally everyone: to 32-year old mothers of minors, to 40-year old military officers, to unmarried daughters of military officers or judges, to leaders of trade unions, to repatriated Greeks from the ex-Soviet Union, to artists as a prize for their work, and to anybody who had supposedly participated in the resistance during the German occupation, including those born in 1933! 7 year old partisans!
The most outrageous benefits were granted to the members of certain unions through the so-called supplementary pension funds. In some cases, these union members, with insurance contributions to the supplementary pension funds of less than 200 Euros in total, have received, up to date, nearly 200,000 Euros per person in supplementary pensions! It was a good investment, don't you agree? Between the year 2000 and today, Greek taxpayers have paid 200 billion Euros for pensions; which corresponds to almost two-thirds of the Greek debt.
In the periods when New Democracy, the alleged Greek conservative party, exercised power, it simply copied PASOK. The two parties, thus, created a monstrous mechanism of clientelism, even stronger than the position of the Prime Minister: The efforts of Constantinos Mitsotakis of New Democracy and of Costas Simitis of PASOK, both prime ministers, to implement some liberal reforms were undermined and eventually reversed by their own parties, themselves!
The clientelistic establishment that grossly inflated the ranks of the civil servants also destroyed the quality of the services provided. The party followers that were appointed were generally people without skills, with minimal education, low intelligence and without any desire to work. A note from a minister that Mr. Rakintzis, the Inspector of Public Administration, discovered in the file of a newly hired civil servant, is very telling. The politician wrote: “He is good for nothing. Just place him somewhere”.
This partisanship has infiltrated everything, and has removed any notion of meritocracy and personal responsibility, eliminated any concept of benefit versus cost, and has also transformed the simplest civil functions into indecipherable riddles. Every time a citizen comes into contact with any part of the state mechanism, he or she knows in advance that they will live through a nightmare of absurdity, stupidity, legal chaos, bureaucratic sadism, wasted time, wasted energy and wasted money. And it is even worse for potential investors.
The parties nurtured state workers unions as a mechanism to control the civil servants. But in doing so, they actually fed a monster that has broken away and is devouring everything in its path. When the union of civil servants goes on strike, the country grinds to a hold. It is estimated that, over the last four decades, the time lost due to strikes by the civil servants is more than 1500 working days! That is approximately 6 years’ worth of work!The unions have imposed an unprecedented regime where there is a complete absence of any control and complete impunity for their union members. Civil servants that have been sentenced for embezzlement of tens of millions of Euros, or even for murder, continue to be paid and keep their posts in the civil service, as if nothing had happened! The heads of the state workers unions are, by law, exempt from work. They cannot be fired, they receive a special union pension, they are illegally financed by the state with hundrends of millions of Euros, with no proof required for their expenses.
So, the Greeks have learnt to survive within a state that is hostile to them, that steals from them, does not fulfil its obligations, and does not honour its agreements. The state entraps its citizens taxes, retroactively, and constantly changes the rules of the game. The Greeks have learnt to operate within a non-existent institutional framework, where there are no checks and balances or separation of powers, where the justice system operates under the thumb of the executive branch, where it takes up to 30 years to reach a court judgement, where most operating regulations are not through laws voted in the parliament, but through decrees issued by each Minister depending on his personal political interests. It is telling that out of the 110.000 regulatory provisions of the last 15 years, a mere 2% have actually been voted in parliament.
Often it is impossible to sort out what to do because of the existence of contradictory laws for the same issue. Evidently, in no way does Greece resemble a western state operating under the rule of law. Thus, in the elections, citizens punish one party by voting for the other, if they don’t abstain altogether, disgusted with the political system as a whole.
This decadence has gradually driven almost all capable people away from politics and, certainly anyone who would be able to reform this state-monster. There have been many examples of worthy, honest, and innovative politicians during these past years, but their own political parties pushed them to the margins, or away from politics altogether.
Most Greeks actually want this model changed. I remember when the troika appeared for the first time, I was in a taxi when I heard the news of the arrival of the troika on the radio. The driver, a simple guy, also heard it, and told me: “Can they stay here forever? Can they get into the ministries, and clean up the deadwood? It is the only way for us to become a real state!”
But this did not happen. Unfortunately, in my opinion, two criminal mistakes were made. The first was made by the Greek political system. First Mr. Samaras, then Mr. Tsipras, discovered the charm of the “revolution” against the bailout agreements. Instead of explaining to the citizens, in every detail, the real causes for the Greek bankruptcy, and instead of supporting the reforms that are necessary for the survival of the country, they fabricated the myth that the evil foreigners want to impoverish us, whilst at the same time they pretend to battle for the salvation of the Greeks. And, in order to preserve the privileges of their clients, they chose to overtax the private sector, forcing over 400.000 Greek companies to close or to relocate, and driving two million Greeks into unemployment, underemployment, or emigration.
The other big mistake was made by the Troika: Even though they were fully aware that the politicians they were dealing with were completely unreliable, they did not demand during the application of the first two bailout agreements that reforms must be made before the money is given. In fact, the Troika should have implemented what I had suggested, back in 2011, in my - very well known in Greece - letter to Chancellor Merkel: “Small installments against specific reforms, step by step. Not all the money at once!”
The governments of George Papandreou and Antonis Samaras voted for the laws of the bailout, took the money, and then voted other laws that annulled the first laws, or simply did not enforce them.
The data pertaining to the pension system are revealing. Even in the middle of the crisis, there are still 200 different pension funds and 40 legal loopholes for early retirement. Even today, one-third of the civil servants retire before the age of 55, with an average retirement age of 56.3 years. 91% of the retirements from the so-called "noble" funds are early. We pay 4.7 billion Euros per year to pensioners below 60 years of age. And, 417,000 people are receiving from 3 to 10 pensions each!
Despite being aware of these facts, the Troika accepted and continues to accept the criminal logic of allowing equivalent measures instead, which means new taxes in order to finance old privileges.
At the January national elections, the Greek people voted for the SYRIZA party because Mr. Tsipras promised tax relief and the end of austerity. At the same time, Mr. Tsipras promised new benefits and the hiring of hundreds of thousands of additional civil servants. Obviously, these were promises that could not be kept. But the Greek voters had to choose between slow death in the hands of the indecisive and ineffective New Democracy and PASOK or the unknown SYRIZA, that campaigned with false promises under the mask of humanitarianism. The people chose the unknown, longing for a change for the better.
While SYRIZA has won two consecutive elections this year, its populist leadership faces a daily painful humiliation, since they are forced to recant on all their pre-election promises. At the same time, New Democracy is forced, for the first time in its history, to face the question of its ideological identity, and there is even a possibility that it will elect a reformer as president of the party. This is of great interest to us because most of our voters are trapped in the polarization that the Greek political system has created, and many of them vote for New Democracy hoping that the Neo-Stalinists of SYRIZA will be defeated and that New Democracy may change its nature.
We, Dimiourgia Xana, are consistent in our pro-European orientation and radical reform agenda. We believe that the European Union is at a critical juncture in its history, since it is becoming necessary to transfer vital responsibilities from the sovereign member states to a central government. It is an extremely complex step, which we could discuss for days. But it is we, the citizens of Europe, and no one else, who have to attempt it, because, if we do not, no single European country alone will be able to play a leading role in the world of tomorrow.
However, the imperfect European structure is not in any way an excuse for the Greek problem. The debt of our country is 100% a Greek achievement, and we must be responsible for the repayment of every cent of it. And, we are the ones responsible for eliminating the mechanism that is creating the debt, because even if the entire debt were written off today, the corrupt system of governance would create the debt all over again.
The reform of our country is our obligation. It can only be done by politicians and technocrats who are not calculating the political cost and are willing to clash with vested interests.
Are there the necessary human resources to achieve this? Of course there are, but you are not seeing them in the news. Greece is full of intelligent, honest, energetic, innovative, productive, decent Greeks, who excel anywhere in the world, when they find an environment where the rule of law and meritocracy apply. Even in Greece, despite the enormous difficulties, there are people who work hard and produce wealth. There are also many competent and honest public servants at every level of the hierarchy that wish to work in an environment of transparent rules and the enforcement of the laws.
The healthy Greece exists everywhere, it exists among the Greeks of the diaspora, it exists in this room, and it exists in the last Greek village. Greece is favoured by nature. It has abundant natural resources, history, culture. In the same way that we excel in the shipping industry, we can excel in all types of business, in academia and in research. If an open-minded government were in power, which would encourage enterprise and innovation, Greece would be galloping.
We ask for your help to accomplish that. Not by giving us new loans, but by supporting reformist voices like ours, those voices that the Greek political system is silencing. It is a matter of time for the Neo-Bolsheviks of SYRIZA to collapse, especially if the European partners stick to their guns and force the Greek Government to reduce the size and waste of the State. This can only be done by shutting down useless public institutions and laying off their staff. Then, we will have a lot of work to do to rebuild Greece from the ground up. It is a big challenge, but we can do it! There are many Greeks like us that have sworn to our children to deliver to them a modern European country, productive, civilized, proud and worthy of its history. We are determined to succeed, no matter how much we will have to fight."
------

A small point: one can always hope, hope dies last. Meanwhile, why not check the flights out of the country while the border is still open; the "neo-bolsheviks", as Mr Tzimeros refers to the present ruling party in Greece, have shown clear authoritarian (neo-fascist?) inclinations...

Monday, 5 October 2015

The Walk

Two went out for a long walk; grandfather and grandson.

The grandfather went away to another world.


I miss the one who left. I am lucky to have the one who is still here.


Wednesday, 16 September 2015

Neurolinguistic Programming and the Use of Presuppositions in the Greek Elections (fall 2015)

Or, why the other parties hardly stand a chance!

Which parties? the non "Syriza" parties. Syriza is a "surprisingly idiotic" party that came to power in the beginning of 2015, in Greece. It made a monumental mess of everything. So much so, that these Greek politicians are worthy contenders to win the "best case of mismanagement ever" world trophy. They did one thing well, however: they placed cronies, girl-friends, and family in the Greek civil service.

No -- make that two things: Syriza was and is very good at marketing communication.

For public speaking, the Syriza leader (Alex Tsipras) puts on a sad, nostalgic, faraway look, and deepens his voice to make it all more appealing and confidence-inspiring. He leans forward to show energy -- but not too far forward, lest it put part of his electorate that is banking on "money for nothing", as the bail-out funds come pouring into Greek state coffers.

Their campaign is also a textbook case in point. It is fully based on presupposition, with mild hypnotic tendencies.
Their slogans run the gamut of "clean break with the past",  "we cleared the past"  "cleaned up" and hence, "we want to move ahead now". The presupposition is, "you know  that we have cleared with the past, it is past, behind you (don't dwell on it), put it out of your mind."
 And then the injunction, mildly hypnotic:
"(As past is gone) focus on our future, vote for us we are moving forward together."


Meanwhile, the other parties are busy trying to convince people, focusing on content, hoping people will actually listen and understand the message and then, miraculously, think and reach the right conclusion -- right for the campaigner at hand, that is.


Good luck to them!



*Greece's Syriza government, a coalition between the thwarted extreme right wing anti-europeans "Free Greeks" and the authoritarian left-wing "Syriza", made a mess of everything: talks and relations with the EU partners, threw the country into deep recession in 6 short months, helped the Athens Stock Exchange lose 77% of it s value, created an unprecedentedly fast capital flight, and imposed cpaital controls. It has also been the most spendthrift government in recent years, recruiting ~20,000 people in the civil service, raised taxes, called 2 more elections in the year, and signed yet another bailout plan with its EU partners. A dictatorship couldn't have done better!

They also lowered the standards of schools in Greece -- such as are still operating, many aren't -- because "excellence is a disease".

Thursday, 20 August 2015

An Insignificant Gesture of Sad Memory

My mother died on a Sunday, 22nd March, at around 11:30 a.m. My 11 year old son was at home at the time, he was sleeping when we left to go to the hospital to see his grandmother.

My mother had suffered a stroke; she fell asleep and never woke up. That Sunday morning was her last - in this world at least.

I am not quite sure what happened when it happened, how things were taken care of, who dealt with paper work and how. I remember a doctor giving me a certificate, and then we were home.

My son, awake, came to the door, holding a small ball -- obviously he had been playing around.

I tried to put it in a roundabout way. My son would not accept what happened until he heard spelled out clearly.
Grandmother is dead.

He started crying, then all of a sudden he threw down the ball and went to the phone crying "I don't believe it".

He picked up the phone and rang his grandmother, as he always did.




Nobody answered.


This insignificantly small gesture, a desperate attempt to negate reality, has remained a vivid memory. An eleven year old yearning for some magic to make the nightmare go away.

Monday, 10 August 2015

The Greece Conundrum - Or Why Is It A Country Consciously Builds Its Desctruction -- In Two Sentences

A little over one month ago, after a bogus referendum (see below) on a non-existent issue, The  Telegraph published a monumentally titled and subtitled article:


"Greece has been taken hostage by a government disguising its incompetence as heroism


Desperate suffering awaits a people who have chosen easy lies over uncomfortable truths"

 

This says it all!

Greece's present government has, in 7 months of mind numbing posturing, idiotic experimentation, and debilitating mismanagement (and some nepotism), plunged Greece into abysmal depths of recession never before seen with such rapidity since the country's modern inception in the early 19th century. So much so, that previous Greek governments -- amongst the world's most inefficient, corrupt, and savagely self-serving -- seem not so bad after all! 

Greece has gone from: 
- a slight positive balance of payments to capital flight (83 B euro) and capital controls
- a mediocre educational system -- despite a high teacher - to - student ratio (13:1) -- to a worse educational system, by design. The education minister of Greece announced that excellence in education is a malady.
- having four relatively capitalized banks operating with chances of surviving the storm - to a banking system reduced to nothingness in one week of stock exchange operation;
- the collapse of the Athens Stock exchange
- a recession-driving new bail-out agreement

...while back at the ranch, the government and its cronies are fighting over what is the comrade-correct thing to do: sleep with the beard under the sheet or over?


If there ever has been a case of mass debilitation, this is it.


And it is contained elegantly and in sufficiency within those two lines.



I think that Greeks do not believe they deserve what they have. So they destroy it to reach the lower level of what they think they justly deserve.

It's a pity.

If they opened their eyes they may have seen that reality is unconscionably brutal about itself: it is, without shades, of grey or otherwise.
If Greeks opened their eyes they may have noticed, or some of them at least, that deserve does not come into the equation: you have what you have, and when you have it you can lose it just as well.

You cannot lose what you do not have and pride is just as much part of it as anything else.

A view from inside a pool at the top of the rock at Kaladi, isle of Kythera, Greece.
Whatever Greeks do or, more likely, choose to NOT do, they should read this short article. Better still, reading being a strain to the eye, someone should read it to them over national television and radio...

Tuesday, 14 July 2015

Greeks Excel In the Face of Adversity...

This is what Dr C Constantinides, founder of Healthcare cybernetics (HCC), wrote in his recent answer to a comment in the IMTJ.  Dr Constantinides is one of the world gurus n Health Tourism.

Interestingly, the commentator maintained that the crisis may have made Greece's foray in the Health Tourism sector more difficult; Dr Constantinides showed that the exact opposite is true. In so doing he relays a positive message, one which is a breath of fresh air after so much doom being aired about the country which, even if imminent, would be better left alone: if doom is at the door, let's enjoy the minutes of life now until it breaks through!

Dr Constantinides' response  is interesting but one point in particular stood out: "Greeks excel in the face of adversity".
Lately, Greeks (as represented by the Greek government) have distinguished themselves in creating adversity (rather than responding to it) so I thought to myself: would the creation of common adversity it be a national trigger to inspire creativity and love of life in Greece.

As the Gods of the Greeks and market research, both know, Greeks are amongst the least happy (or most unhappy?) of Europeans. They may have reason to be, but the point is: could a adversity be the key to a nationwide snapping-out-of-it?


Let's hope so.

I am presently in Athens, the weather is good (hot but cool in the shade), recent winds have cleared the sky of pollution, the colours are magnificent.

If adversity can help preserve this, long live adversity! And long live the Germans, the bad guys of choice in Greece at this moment who fuel this adversity!



Monday, 13 July 2015

Eurogroup marathon talks, early Monday morning, 13th July 2015: a tough, humiliating deal for Greece, says a German Newspaper (Bild) for Greece...

Is it?

The good news and the bad news. Reportedly...


No doubt, 6 years of austerity are down the drain as Greece received and spent ±240 bn euro and is still, no further or perhaps even worse off than where it started.

One reason for this apparent standstill was that austerity in the form of cuts in public investment and salary cuts in the public sector and pension cuts, as well as back-breaking increases in income tax brought about a sharp reduction in peoples' spending budget and cut out many organisations' livelihood: the Greek state. And this, in turn, brought about recession.

After 6 years of recession, and five months of an unconventional government by a populist and somewhat totalitarian party, Syriza, Greece is back in recession, and asking for a third bailout.

The pre-conditions of this bailout, should it be accepted, are reportedly tough, humiliating, and threaten to upset the status quo in Greece as Greeks know it.

How bad is it??

How humiliating?

While I don't have the actual text, reportedly it calls for a number of things.

First is the usual fruit of short-sighted governments: even higher taxation - in part in order to compensate for the Greek government's continued refusal to reduce the number of people on its payroll (it has actually added 10,000 civil servants in the 5 months of its governance).
As usual in Greece, some of the measures (e.g. VAT) will hit lower income earners more than others. Typically these are the people least likely to raise a stink, so the motto is, "slam them".

- It does however also include gradual revocation of privileges (not bad), taxation of shipowners (unlikely, unless one can convince them to contribute - which is not a bad idea as they can make a  difference!)
- It also mentions relaxation of labour law restrictions; at the onset, not bad either especially given the ±1.45 mn unemployed in Greece
- There is also mention of liberalisation of closed professions
- Reduction in bureaucracy

...and much of this enacted asap, before bailout talks begin.
Also, reforms will be secured by EU supervision.

I.e. reforms are to be guaranteed in Greece by the Greek government and an EU supervisory team...

Which makes me think of the following positive point:
a foreign "supervisor", who is to blame for everything, is the ideal justification for quick implementation of measures which go against local pressure groups and self-serving political and business oligarchs (union leaders, tycoons, etc): "not my fault, could;t do anything. I'm with you! (Until you die out, hopefully soon...)"



Wednesday, 8 July 2015

Taking things into our hands... and make miracle happen for someone out there.

An Englishman, Thom Feeney raised ~2 million euro in just over week in a crowd-funding campaign to help Greeks pay back the IMF tranche due last week.
The 2 million came from all over; much from the two countries least likely: Germany and the UK!


Thom said he acted because politicians are delaying on all sides, because Europeans are largely generous people and because the Greek people need help. Since those in power fail to do it, the people have to do it by themselves...

This is what "by the people for the people" mean: "I may not like your politicians (or mine) but I can distinguish between them and you. And in punishing them, I am condemning you -- I don't want that."

Feeney's last point - or the gist of it - is gaining a lot of ground lately. Either that or I am seeing things.

Let's for a moment, assume that it is; what could it mean?

For one, politicians are seen as slow, indecisive, and ineffective. And, more importantly that people can step in. Effectively, bypass politicians and do it yourself.

This is a major change: until now we have people demonstrating in order to draw politicians' attention to their will. Politicians oblige by ignoring everyone until time is ripe for elections; and the sage continued.

Maybe the role of politicians has to change; in many countries politicians are proving poor in addressing everyday problems. They often are less than efficient in the grand scheme of things as well...

Maybe it is the power of the internet in weaving the global community.

I think it is certain that people have come to realise that many of today's politicians fall short as exponents of collective feeling, preferences, and choices.
Politicians' egos play a major role in any negotiating game - sidelining the content of the discussion.

Further, let's think of what our average (european) politician often is: a communicative person - sales rep profile - with a proven background in social speaking or union activism or political involvement as a student. The party then chooses him her to play a leading role - i.e. promotes that person to sales director or CEO position. Then campaign managers and image makers hone the ex sales rep into a product that can sell to the voters.

In other words, the primary skills set required of a politicians is his her capacity to get elected. Then, of course, comes persuasiveness. And then, I presume, comes discipline: i.e. to tow the party line.

None of the above is bad per se and some politicians probably do not fit the stereotype either; but most do. Case in point: in Greece the PM told people that voting "no" to a referendum is equivalent to voting for democracy, voting no to oppression, for self-respect etc. This guideline had nothing to do with the official content of that referendum, but that did not stop politicians from supporting it or criticising it, accordingly. While this is an extreme example of demagogy, similar examples of context and content shifting and communication exploitation  exist elsewhere as well:  just not as exacerbated nor as extreme.


So in the face of this why not do as Thom did: bypass politicians rather than confront them.


It is great to take initiative rather than expect it from others and it is good to have people collectively agree and act together.
The word together gives hope to everyone: I am not alone, I can help another I can make a miracle happen for someone else.

Monday, 6 July 2015

Greece's Referendum: the David Syndrome

Reading about reactions to the results of the (sham) referendum in Greece, I asked myself why is it that Greeks voted the way they did?

I don't mean to pay more than lip service to the political declarations bandied about -- but the real why. Maybe it would be one of the political pronouncements, maybe not. It wasn't.

Thoughts led me to an astounding "aha" moment: in a reductionist, I concur, view of the affair I realise that a large section of the population is in David psychology. That that sizeable section of the population sees the country as a valiant, developing nation and not as what Greece really is: a wealthy country (not so much due to the crisis) part of the EU, member of the eurozone.

The present Greek government feeds this view; maybe its members believe it or maybe they are suffering under the weight of a massive inferiority complex. The fatc of the matter is that Greece is a member of the rich mens' club, and its present government and many of its voters interpret their discontent as the need to assert their existence. Which is not in doubt. This is akin to the thwarted adolescent, looking for his or her path in life...

The signs are there: the need to assert, to say no, to "dare", to "challenge" the "bullies" who are oppressing us", i.e. not sucking up to us or openly saying "I love you".


There are no bullies, so to speak. Greece is a country that belongs to the rich mens' club and, despite all the recession and the austerity, its civil servants are all still there (unlike, say, Romania) and still earn more than they did 15 years ago; it may not be much but it is something.

No, the bullies are inside us.

Let's hope the euro-partners catch on to this, fast.


Greece Referendum: Defiance Aside, What's Next?


Nothing, it would seem.

Greek were asked to vote yes or no to a 47 page document in English, unavailable within the country (and mostly incomprehensible). It was an expired bailout proposal from the Eurogroup. The country's government extolled voters to choose "no" to "oppression" and humiliation and for prosperity, growth, and dignity.

So, people voted NO to regain their dignity, and spearhead growth, prosperity, etc. Except that growth, etc begins with money, apparently, and in Greece's case, other people's money. The lenders would be the EU this time round.

The country's PM, A Tsipras declared on Friday that a "NO" vote leads to an agreement in 48 hrs. The finance minister Y Varoufakis also explained that a deal with the ECB is a simple matter, "can even be conducted via teleconference".

If Greeks have the short memory the ruling party attributes to them, then all is OK. Come Wednesday and still in after glow of defiance, they won't really remember what politicians promised one week before.
If not -- or if someone reminds them (unlikely) -- then the Greek government may have a problem.

While one side (Eurogroup) is expecting initiative from the other side, the other side (Greek government) is basically expecting a move from the other side, just to drive home that Greece now has the upper hand (as promised).

Greece's finance minister (or negotiations minister) Yiannis Varoufakis resigned on Monday morning - reportedly. One never knows, he may un-resign later in the day.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Greek government is purportedly preparing to issue IOU which it will use to pay off its internal creditors.

If it does that, it will be blamed on the Eurogroup.

And yet: Greece's best friends at this moment are its euro-partners. The same people its government has criticised , vilified, and at times, abused.